As much as the government and people of United States despise them, you think that they would detect socialistic ideas and programs within their own system. One of the programs remains privately owned, while the other is integrated into our entire lives. The private business is sold as “insurance.” Insurance for your life, health, home, car, and scare others. All require a set amount of money for a set amount of time, just in case something happens to that item that is being insured.

Most insurance companies pocket the money given to them, and give it back in dire times when you need it (although limits are set on that also).

Wait, so socialism: Unequal efforts given to one cause, are then redistributed equally among them…

And insurance: Unequal efforts (assuming your fee varies due to circumstances) given to one cause, are then redistributed equally among them (assuming there is a limit per event).

Now, assuming this isn’t true for every case, but besides the notes in the parenthesis, those two statements are exactly the same.

Just in case you don’t really know what’s what, socialism is:

a broad array of doctrines or political movements that envisage a socio-economic system in which property and the distribution of wealth are subject to control by the community.

Communism, my dear friends, is a form of socialism. Tie the pieces together a bit? Keep in mind that not all the money collected by the insurance company is redistributed to the people. This is how they make money: Not everyone needs the money. They keep what they don’t have to give away.

Sadly, this entire system is something that the American cannot avoid, because America has, so wisely, embedded it into its law, making it illegal to not have insurance, at least for an automobile. So what good does it do, knowing this information and not being able to do anything about it? Well, my advice is: Rebel and inform… Perhaps in the opposite order, so that they don’t stereotype you as a “rebel” and ignore everything you say. Hopefully some will get changed sometime in the near future.

Some people might say, “Well, do you have a better idea?” And my answer is:

Yes. I do. Let people regulate and protect their own money for when they need to use it. Not everyone is as stupid as they appear.

“But what if they don’t have any money saved up?” And my answer is:

You can always get a loan. You have to spend money to make money sometimes, and the loaner should realize that.